Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +2 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The Weather Channel's Home Page Is a Masterful Response to Trump Pulling Out of Paris Accord

The Weather Channel's Home Page Is a Masterful Response to Trump Pulling Out of Paris Accord | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

In addition to giving you a weather update whenever you need it, The Weather Channel is known as an unapologetic defender of the idea, backed by basically the entire science community, that climate change is real, and a real threat to life on earth as we know it.


It is unsurprising then, that the front page of its digital site would address President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris climate accord, announced today. The way it did, it, however, is a work of art.


It starts in a straightforward enough manner, with a main story whose headline reads “Trump Pulls U.S. Out of Paris Climate Agreement; What That Means.” That may be the point when you notice that the group of stories below are all about climate change, and that the atypical headlines of seven of them collectively send an unequivocal message.


Put them all together, and this is what you get: “So, What Happens to Earth Now? Still Don’t Care? Proof You Should …and More Proof… …and Even More Proof… …Or the Imminent Collapse of a Key Ice Shelf… …or Antarctica Turning Green… …or California’s Coast Disappearing Into the Sea…”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

“Still Don’t Care? Proof You Should” is The Weather Channel's response to Trump.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Footnoting the truth in the Trump era | Alexandra Samuels

Footnoting the truth in the Trump era | Alexandra Samuels | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Today the New York Times rolled out the big guns in the battle for truth. There, in Jim Rutenberg’s latest Mediator column, were two digits the likes of which I have never seen in the Grey Lady.


Footnotes, people. Honest-to-God footnotes.


The footnotes were there to annotate a story about the Trump administration’s disregard for the truth: ‘Alternative Facts’ and the Costs of Trump-Branded Reality.


By necessity, that story referenced two of the administration’s newly minuted “alternative facts”, a.k.a. lies. The first of these was the claim by Sean Spicer, the new press secretary, that more people had used DC’s Metro system the morning of Trump’s inauguration than had used it the morning of Obama’s 2013 inauguration.


The second was the President’s accusation that tensions between Trump and the intelligence community were caused by the meddling media....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Footnotes. Antidote to alternate facts?

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

A hellscape of lies and distorted reality awaits journalists covering President Trump | Washington Post

A hellscape of lies and distorted reality awaits journalists covering President Trump | Washington Post | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

What can this small chapter tell us about what’s to come?


That Trump will be what columnist Frida Ghitis of the Miami Herald calls “the gaslighter in chief” — that he will pull out all the stops to make people think that they should believe him, not their own eyes. (“Gaslighting” is a reference to the 1940s movie in which a manipulative husband psychologically abuses his wife by denying the reality that the gaslights in their home are growing dimmer and dimmer.)


“The techniques,” Ghitis wrote, “include saying and doing things and then denying it, blaming others for misunderstanding, disparaging their concerns as oversensitivity, claiming outrageous statements were jokes or misunderstandings, and other forms of twilighting the truth.”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Margaret William writes that the past tells us plenty about what to expect from the ‘gaslighter in chief.’ You can add twilighting to the list of terms you need to know in the fake news future.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Cover Story: John W. Tomac’s “Liberty’s Flameout” | The New Yorker

Cover Story: John W. Tomac’s “Liberty’s Flameout” | The New Yorker | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Under more ordinary circumstances, the cover of the issue for February 13 and 20, 2017—our Anniversary Issue, marking ninety-two years—would feature some version of Rea Irvin’s classic image of the monocled dandy Eustace Tilley. This year, as a response to the opening weeks of the Trump Administration, particularly the executive order on immigration, we feature John W. Tomac’s dark, unwelcoming image, “Liberty’s Flameout.” “It used to be that the Statue of Liberty, and her shining torch, was the vision that welcomed new immigrants. And, at the same time, it was the symbol of American values,” Tomac says. “Now it seems that we are turning off the light.”


Here is a slide show of past Anniversary Issue covers....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Francoise Mouly speaks to the artist John W. Tomac about “Liberty’s Flameout,” his Statue of Liberty-inspired cover for the next issue of The New Yorker.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Trump Is Making Journalism Great Again

Trump Is Making Journalism Great Again | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Donald Trump and his forthcoming presidency may be the greatest gift to Washington journalism since the invention of the expense account. His unorthodox approach to politics and governance has vaporized the standard, useful, yet boring script for reporting on a new administration’s doings. At his news conference last week, Trump began the process of washing the press completely out of his fake hair as he castigated CNN and BuzzFeed for reporting on the oppo-research dossier compiled on him. “Fake news,” said the man who has appeared on InfoWars and commended the outlet’s efforts.


Trump’s surrogate Newt Gingrich took to Sean Hannity’s program on Fox to assist in the maiming of the media. Trump and his team “need to go out there and understand they have it in their power to set the terms of this dialogue,” Gingrich said on the Jan. 11 episode. “They can close down the elite press.” Next up came Reince Priebus’announcement that Trump might evict the presidential press corps from the White House for lesser lodging in the adjacent Old Executive Office Building, and Sean Spicer’s admonition that reporters “adhere to a high level of decorum at press briefings and press conferences,” according to a readout of his two-hour summit with the head of the White House Correspondents’ Association. (Or else what, one wonders?)


Now, before the Committee to Protect Journalists throws up the batsign and the rest of us bemoan Trump’s actions as anti-press—which they are—let’s thank the incoming president for simplifying our mission. If Trump’s idea of a news conference is to spank the press, if his lieutenants believe the press needs shutting down, if his chief of staff wants to speculate about moving the White House press scrum off the premises, perhaps reporters ought to take the hint and prepare to cover his administration on their own terms. Instead of relying exclusively on the traditional skills of political reporting, the carriers of press cards ought to start thinking of covering Trump’s Washington like a war zone, where conflict follows conflict, where the fog prevents the collection of reliable information directly from the combatants, where the assignment is a matter of life or death....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

In his own way, Trump has set journalism free.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The One Essential Skill You Need In The Facebook Era

The One Essential Skill You Need In The Facebook Era | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Paul Horner is a professional fake news writer, whose completely made-up story about the Amish committing their vote to Trump got over 134,000 likes on Facebook; his story about Obama signing an executive order to invalidate the election results has over 250,000 likes.

 

This week, The Washington Post’s Caitlin Dewey interviewed Horner--who is stunned that his work gets accepted as true.

 

“I think Trump is in the White House because of me. His followers don’t fact-check anything -- they’ll post everything, believe anything. His campaign manager posted my story about a protester getting paid $3,500 as fact. Like, I made that up. I posted a fake ad on Craigslist… I thought they’d fact-check it, and it’d make them look worse. I mean that’s how this always works:

 

Someone posts something I write, then they find out it’s false, then they look like idiots. But Trump supporters -- they just keep running with it! They never fact-check anything!”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The one essential skill you need in the Facebook era? Fact-checking. Witness election 2016.

No comment yet.