Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +0 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How to Respond to People on Twitter: A Simple Guide for Businesses [Infographic]

How to Respond to People on Twitter: A Simple Guide for Businesses [Infographic] | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Thanks to Twitter, businesses are closer to consumers than ever before. Tweets haven't replaced phone calls and handwritten letters, but they've become a popular way for consumers to vocalize their questions, praise, or complaints -- all in plain view of anyone who can find the conversation online.

But customers don't just expect you to read their tweets about you -- they also expect you to reply. According to charts published on Search Engine Watch, 70% of surveyed Twitter users expect a response from brands they reach out to on Twitter. Of those users, 53% want that response in under an hour. 

It's important to have a solid strategy for responding to tweets so you can keep your customers happy and drive engagement on Twitter. Should you include a link in your response? How much punctuation (?, !) should you use? Are emoticons off the table?

To help inform your Twitter response strategy, LeadSift gathered data on answers to these questions and more, and culminated them into the visual below. Consider this data in the context of your own brand voice and what you know about your buyers' behavior to develop an action plan when responses come rolling in. And hurry -- your customers are waiting.
Jeff Domansky's insight:

Twitter is the new customer service tool, for better or for worse. Here's how to get your strategy ready.

Anton Rosa's curator insight, April 14, 2015 2:10 PM

Really helpful guide to get into twitter's business and to learn how to develop and use that social network

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Why Twitter Should Not Algorithmically Curate the Timeline | Medium

Why Twitter Should Not Algorithmically Curate the Timeline | Medium | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

...So, why the distaste for a change that would benefit many of them? It’s simple: Twitter’s uncurated feed certainly has some downsides, and I can see some algorithmic improvements that would make it easier for early users to adopt the service, but they’d potentially be chopping off the very—sometimes magical—ability of mature Twitter to surface from the network. And the key to this power isn't the reverse chronology but rather the fact that the network allows humans to exercise free judgment on the worth of content, without strong algorithmic biases. That cumulative, networked freedom is what extends the range of what Twitter can value and surface, and provides some of the best experiences of Twitter....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

It’s the Human Judgment of the Flock, Not the Lone Bird, That Powers It writes Zeynep Tufekci. This is important insight for all Twitter fans and serious users. Recommended reading 10/10

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

There’s Something Rotten In The State Of Social Media | TechCrunch

There’s Something Rotten In The State Of Social Media | TechCrunch | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

...But if Twitter, the human-curated information network, ceased to exist? Well, it doesn’t bear thinking about…


The thing is, effort does not scale well online. People have become conditioned to expect convenience; to expect to have the hard work done for them. The rise of mobile usage has hugely fueled this mentality — making it even more imperative for a digital service to be hyper simple to set up and use. If it doesn’t ‘just work’ within a matter of seconds it likely won’t get used at all.


Although I don’t have to spend very much time at all maintaining my Twitter feed now, with six years invested in the service, that’s exactly because I have spent multiple years figuring out who it’s worth my while following (and who not).


Sure there are undoubtedly plenty of folk on Twitter who I haven’t found yet who could expand my network in new and interesting ways. But you can’t usefully follow every interesting person (whatever Robert Scoble says). And, more importantly, I don’t trust an algorithm that’s geared towards maximizing business profits to identify interesting  people on my behalf. That algorithm would be working for Twitter’s shareholders, not for my brain.


Bottom line: who I choose not to follow is as core a part of why Twitter is so useful to me as those accounts I do add to my follow list....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Something smells increasingly rotten in the state of social media. it's really important for the social channel owners and the users to think very seriously about the future of social media.

No comment yet.