Remember how difficult it was to get hold of logos in the early days of the internet?
I don’t mean the really early days, I mean the time when most brands had web sites but corporate and product logos were still jealously guarded. Try to copy them and it wouldn’t work, or they’d be watermarked, or obstructively trademarked. Not that I ever tried to do such a thing.
Social media has changed all that. Today a lot of brands make deliberate decisions to enable people to use their images, and in particular their logos, far and wide, providing it’s seen as being in their best interests to do so. There will always be the risk that some joker will use it for nefarious purposes, but most progressive communciations people seem to take the view that those are punches to be rolled with. And given the conversation it’d probably generate online, all publicity is good publicity. Probably.
Yet what has befallen poor Subway today is another example of brand sabotage that has the potential to cause reptuational damage. And the ability to share images is at the heart of it....
[Social media brings interesting marketing and PR challenges - JD]
Finding truth, telling stories and building community are great recipes for success like Andy Frisella.