Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +2 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Maggie Haberman and David Fahrenthold accidentally became Trump experts

How Maggie Haberman and David Fahrenthold accidentally became Trump experts | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Maggie Haberman started working at the New York Times in 2015 — with just one little problem. She didn’t know what she was supposed to be doing there.“

 

I was looking for a lane, so I picked up Trump because nobody seemed very interested in Trump,” Haberman said on the latest episode of Recode Decode, hosted by Kara Swisher. “I knew him and I knew his people.”

 

Just two years later, she’s one of the NYT’s best-known reporters thanks to her coverage of Trump’s campaign and, now, his presidency. But for most of her career, Haberman had dreamed of one day being the Times’ chief New York correspondent, covering the city’s “broken” political system.

 

Speaking with Swisher at the 2017 Texas Tribune Festival, along with Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold, Haberman said she learned “the number one rule” about Donald Trump while working at the New York Post, which he would call frequently as a “source” of gossip about himself.

 

“In his brain, two things are true,” she said. “No one speaks for him except him, even if he actually has a spokesman, and he believes that facts can be changed so that they can be something other than what you thought they were a day ago.”

Jeff Domansky's insight:

On the latest Recode Decode, the two journalists explain how their careers set them up to cover the Trump Era.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Fake news is a convenient scapegoat, but the big 2016 problem was the real news

Fake news is a convenient scapegoat, but the big 2016 problem was the real news | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Speaking in early December at a ceremony to honor Harry Reid’s retirement from the US Senate, Hillary Clinton took aim at a target that would have been totally unfamiliar to audiences as recently as the summer of 2016: fake news.


She spoke of “an epidemic” of the stuff that has “flooded social media” over the past year and “can have real-world consequences.”


This was reported largely as commentary on the Pizzagate conspiracy theory, which had recently led to an alarming armed standoff at DC’s Comet Ping Pong restaurant. But it was also pretty clearly an allusion to her own recently failed presidential campaign, especially because she spoke favorably of the idea of bipartisan legislation to curb foreign propaganda news, arguing that “it is imperative that leaders in both the private and public sector step up to protect our democracy and innocent lives.”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

You can’t blame Macedonian teens for disastrously email-centric coverage. Fake news has always been a social media reality. We just haven't figured out how to deal with it. My 2017 prediction? Mainstream media will flail helplessly against fake news again in 2017.

rodrick rajive lal's curator insight, December 20, 2016 10:46 PM
Fake news has been used to boost TRP ratings and sales of newspapers in the vernacular languages in India. 2016 will be marked as the year when Fake News ruled the roost! The problem with Fake News is that there is a grave danger of people beginning to believe in it. While no doubt, Fake News can be the latest tool for lampooning specific people, its partisan nature might also whip up communal tension. In a society that is getting fragmented, Fake News could only be Bad News! 
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

A hellscape of lies and distorted reality awaits journalists covering President Trump | Washington Post

A hellscape of lies and distorted reality awaits journalists covering President Trump | Washington Post | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

What can this small chapter tell us about what’s to come?


That Trump will be what columnist Frida Ghitis of the Miami Herald calls “the gaslighter in chief” — that he will pull out all the stops to make people think that they should believe him, not their own eyes. (“Gaslighting” is a reference to the 1940s movie in which a manipulative husband psychologically abuses his wife by denying the reality that the gaslights in their home are growing dimmer and dimmer.)


“The techniques,” Ghitis wrote, “include saying and doing things and then denying it, blaming others for misunderstanding, disparaging their concerns as oversensitivity, claiming outrageous statements were jokes or misunderstandings, and other forms of twilighting the truth.”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Margaret William writes that the past tells us plenty about what to expect from the ‘gaslighter in chief.’ You can add twilighting to the list of terms you need to know in the fake news future.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The post-truth world of the Trump administration is scarier than you think

The post-truth world of the Trump administration is scarier than you think | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

You may think you are prepared for a post-truth world, in which political appeals to emotion count for more than statements of verifiable fact.


But now it’s time to cross another bridge — into a world withoutfacts. Or, more precisely, where facts do not matter a whit.


On live radio Wednesday morning, Scottie Nell Hughes sounded breezy as she drove a stake into the heart of knowable reality:


“There’s no such thing, unfortunately, anymore, of facts,” she declared on “The Diane Rehm Show.”


Hughes, a frequent surrogate for President-elect Donald Trump and a paid commentator for CNN during the campaign, kept defending that assertion, although not with much clarity of expression.


Rehm had pressed her about Trump’s recent evidence-free assertion on Twitter that he, not Hillary Clinton, would have won the popular vote if millions of immigrants had not voted illegally....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The president-elect’s inner circle is now utterly dismissing the existence of facts. Welcome to 1984! Recommended reading! 9/10

weighingequuleus1's curator insight, December 7, 2016 4:54 AM

well

Jayme Soulati's curator insight, December 7, 2016 8:19 AM
We'll never stop talking about this topic. #Textbook warfare.