Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +1 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Half of people 'remember' fake facts that never happened

Half of people 'remember' fake facts that never happened | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

A new study casts some doubt on something very personal: our memories.  


About  one in two people are highly prone to ‘remembering’ events that never happened, researchers from the University ofWarwick have found. 


Dr Kimberley Wade in the Department of Psychology proved  that if people are told about a completely fictitious event from “their lives,” they start to imagine it, and about half of people are willing  to accept it as reality. 


She and her colleagues recruited 400 participants, asking them to “recall” several different types of false memories – such as taking a childhood hot air balloon ride, playing a prank on a teacher, or creating havoc at a family wedding.  


To some extent, more than 50% of them claimed they remember it – 30% of participants appeared to fully ‘remember’ the event while 23% showed signs that they accepted the suggested event to some degree....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

A new study casts some doubt on something very personal: our memories. Research for the curious.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Why the Remain Campaign’s Persuasion Strategy Backfired

Why the Remain Campaign’s Persuasion Strategy Backfired | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

For supporters of Britain staying in the EU, a simple question remains this morning: How did we fail to persuade voters of our position? Steve Martin, director at Influence at Work in London and best-selling author of several books on persuasion, spoke with HBR about the ways in which the Remain advocates’ message failed to get through, or even backfired. Martin was joined by Joseph Marks, a behavioral scientist on his team.

HBR: From a persuasion science point of view, how do you explain the vote for Britain’s exit from the EU?
Steve Martin: There seems to have been a focusing effect. The Leave side made sure that immigration became a focus. Not only a focus but the focus. And once that’s a focus it’s hard to get other messages through. What we see is all there is. Danny Kahneman said that clearly. We can only pay attention to a limited number of things and if we see that immigration story every day, that’s what affects us more than a rational argument that predicts what would happen if we left.

But they saw the economic arguments every day, too. Why couldn’t the Remain side focus the voters on that?
Joseph Marks: I think both campaigns were built around fear of loss. One was what we’re losing in terms of immigration coming in. And one was loss to the economy and your pocket. Normally that wins. That’s number one. But right now, you can see that immigration issue as happening now, in the present, whilst the economy is doing well. In the optimism literature, we’ve seen that people are generally optimistic about their own futures when the economy is good, so that’s maybe how the economic argument lost to something that feels more pressing to people. So ironically the very people who helped get our economy on track created an environment that makes it harder to communicate their message of potential negative impacts of leaving the EU. The health of the economy created a good economic environment that had a disproportionate influence over decision making at that moment....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Valuable lessons from Brexit for marketers and politicians alike.

No comment yet.