Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +14 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The worst video media disaster of March 2014 | Brad Phillips

The worst video media disaster of March 2014 | Brad Phillips | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

CNN’s coverage of the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was, quite frankly, embarrassing at times.


...Instead, with its saturation coverage of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, CNN has taken a giant step backward, part of its inverted metamorphosis from well-respected news outlet to “The Jerry Springer Show.” The coverage reached its nadir during Don Lemon’s newscasts.


First, Mr. Lemon speculated that the supernatural could be responsible for the plane’s disappearance: “Especially today, on a day when we deal with the supernatural, we go to church, the supernatural power of God,” he said. “You deal with all of that. People are saying to me, why aren’t you talking about the possibility—and I’m just putting it out there—that something odd happened to this plane, something beyond our understanding?” ...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Brad Phillips wonders if there is journalistic integrity remaining at CNN.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Pass the pipe: Gawker's "Crackstarter" is skeezy but potentially significant | Pando Daily

Pass the pipe: Gawker's "Crackstarter" is skeezy but potentially significant | Pando Daily | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Gawker is about $80,000 into a cheeky scheme to raise a couple hundred grand to pay some drug dealers for a video that allegedly shows Toronto Mayor Rob Ford smoking crack. The “Crackstarter” campaign has caught some flak on ethical grounds – some people are uncomfortable with the idea of a news organization paying drug dealers for anything – but put those concerns aside and you can see that Gawker’s experiment presents a pretty useful case study for the idea of crowdfunding journalism....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Does this scheme by Gawker cross ethical boundaries? You decide...

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Motor Trend Journalist Also Taking Money To Be A Spokesperson For An Oil Company

Motor Trend Journalist Also Taking Money To Be A Spokesperson For An Oil Company | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Motor Trend's Jessi Lang says she is a journalist who wants to help "build relationships" between that publication and its readers while covering the auto industry.

 

She's also being paid to represent oil company Phiillips 66 as a spokesperson who is trying to help influence young people to buy their gas, something Motor Trend doesn't appear to be telling its readers.

 

Taking payment from a potential newsmaker is a generally frowned upon practice, but Lang, and the PR firm representing Phillips 66, say Motor Trend approves of her simultaneously representing an automotive publication and a company that's part of the automotive industry....

 

[Ethically challenged? ~ Jeff]

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Dan Rather: 'Quote approval' a media sellout - CNN.com

Dan Rather: 'Quote approval' a media sellout - CNN.com | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Dan Rather says the practice of reporters letting candidates review their quotes furthers politicians' interests, but not the public's.

 

A New York Times front-page article Monday detailed a new phenomenon in news coverage of the presidential campaign: candidates insisting on "quote approval," telling reporters what they can and cannot use in some stories. And, stunningly, reporters agreeing to it.


This, folks, is news. Any way you look at it, this is a jaw-dropping turn in journalism, and it raises a lot of questions. Among them: Can you trust the reporters and news organizations who do this? Is it ever justified on the candidate's side or on the reporter's side? Where is this leading us?


As someone who's been covering presidential campaigns since the 1950s, I have no delusions about political reporting....

 

[Does journalism still have integrity? - JD]

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Arrington's TechCrunch Moves Even Startle Trade Mag Editors

Arrington's TechCrunch Moves Even Startle Trade Mag Editors | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
The ethical overhaul TechCrunch's founder wants to make of journalism is even bigger than it seems...

 

...Here's what's interesting about this situation to me: the set of solutions to common information problems that we call journalism is coming unglued as different types of publications become possible on the Internet.

 

The generally accepted sense of journalistic ethics says you shouldn't have financial conflicts of interest and that this is not negotiable at the individual level. Journalism ethics reside in publications and more broadly within the idea of the fourth estate....

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The colossal arrogance of Newsweek’s Bitcoin “scoop”

The colossal arrogance of Newsweek’s Bitcoin “scoop” | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

WIthout more evidence, it's time for a retraction....


...The problem with the story is that it doesn't appear to be true. Dorian Nakamoto—who hasn’t gone by the name “Satoshi” in almost 40 years—made the second of two very public denials this week. “I got nothing to do with it,” Nakamoto said during his first denial, a two-hour interview with the Associated Press.


Goodman’s story looks like a scientific experiment gone bad: it can’t be replicated. It’s grounded in assumptions, topped with myths and stereotypes, and then backed up by an arrogant-sounding “trust us” defense.


The AP video shows a man who appears wholly convincing. “The main reason I’m here is to clear my name, that I have nothing to do with Bitcoin,” Nakamoto said. “Leah wrote all that?” he added with a shake of his head, incredulous. If Dorian Nakamoto is the hidden genius behind Bitcoin, he's also one of history’s most skilled liars; his impression of “unemployed suburban man” was spot-on....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The debate over Newsweek's cover story on Bitcoin, journalism standards, ethics and approach continues.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Matthew Keys’ legal defense in face of hacking indictment: He was an undercover journalist | The Next Web

Matthew Keys’ legal defense in face of hacking indictment: He was an undercover journalist | The Next Web | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

When Reuters now-suspended deputy social media editor Matthew Keys was indicted over allegedly helping members of Anonymous deface the LA Times, using credentials that he provided, it was a surprise.

 

How Keys intends to defend himself is now in the open: His lawyers claim that he was an undercover journalist. As reported by the Huffington Post, his lawyer said the following: “This is sort of an undercover-type, investigative journalism thing, and I know undercover — I’m using that term loosely [...] This is a guy who went where he needed to go to get the story. He went into the sort of dark corners of the Internet. He’s being prosecuted for that, for going to get the story.”.--

Jeff Domansky's insight:

This story has more twists and turns than the Magic Mountain ride at Six Flags...

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Insecure reporters need to stiffen their backbone | Washington Post

Insecure reporters need to stiffen their backbone | Washington Post | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Reporters wrong to share drafts with sources.

 

Should reporters allow their sources to alter a quote after it has been spoken, or even to review drafts of their stories before publication?

 

In the former, I say usually no. In the latter, I say “Hell, no.”

 

...After a reporting trip to Austin, de Vise shared two drafts of his article with UT officials prior to publication. They didn’t like the first version, saying that its tone and thrust were unfair to the university. Among the more embarrassing e-mails was one by de Vise that accompanied his second draft, saying, “I’d like to know of any phrases in the piece that you think are too harsh or over-hyped. . . . Everything here is negotiable.”

 

De Vise is a fair-minded, conscientious and thorough reporter. But he made a mistake.

 

He forgot that Post reporters write for readers, not for sources....

 

[Great conversation around sources, ethics and journalistic integrity which apply to business too - JD]

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

There Is No Such Thing as a 'Larger Truth': This American Life's Rich History of Embellishment

There Is No Such Thing as a 'Larger Truth': This American Life's Rich History of Embellishment | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
Mike Daisey has been roundly and justly castigated for selling his bullshit stories about visiting the Foxconn complex in Shenzhen, China, to This American Life.

 

But even some of his harshest critics are buying into the idea that, in some contexts—just not "journalistic ones"—it's OK to tell little lies in service of a "larger truth."

 

This is dreck. All truths are the same size....

No comment yet.