We may already be living in a truthless dystopia.
It’s no secret that the professional media is in crisis. But what if the situation is even worse than those of us in the industry thought?
What if vast swaths of the public no longer believe the news on controversial political stories, even when it comes from established media outlets?
What if the public ascribes no value to professional news organizations?
That situation may sound terrifying to journalists and media owners, but we may be heading there quickly.
Researchers at Yale University have found that 40% of the public are now willing to dismiss perfectly accurate stories, regardless of the source. What may be even more disturbing is that articles sourced to a top news brand are perceived to have no more credibility than articles sourced to a joke brand, or none at all.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky |
Keith Ramos's curator insight,
September 29, 2017 9:03 PM
This article is interesting because it points out how Americans are causing major credibility issues to news sources. The claim of the study is that Americans are beginning to not believe the news, even from top news brands and another percentage of people are even believing fake news. An online study of 7500 people conducted by Yale found that 40% of the public are now willing to dismiss perfectly accurate stories, regardless of the source, even when provided with credible new from a reliable source such as NPR. In contrast to this, a fake news article about President Trump was believed by 17% of those participants. This study essentially indicates that even real news is subject to a major credibility problem and that if these trends increase so will the problem.
R- The article is reputable because it provides a well known and credible source (Yale University), as well as provides precise statistics and evidence from the study that was conducted
A- The article provides a good ability to observe because it is based on a study that observes/analyzes the response of the subjects in the survey.
V- There doesn't appear to be any vested interests in the article, and it only provides awareness of the issues at hand.
E- There is expertise in this article, and it comes from Yale’s David Rand, an associate professor of psychology, management and economics, and postdoctoral fellow Gordon Pennycook who are responsible for conducting the study.
N- The survey in the article may be somewhat biased because the questions asked were about Clinton/Trump, so the answers may be affected due to the fact that some side with Trump while others side with Clintom.
Sign up to comment
No easy wins in a world of the fake news and low media credibility.