Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +2 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

The mysterious group that’s picking Breitbart apart, one tweet at a time

The mysterious group that’s picking Breitbart apart, one tweet at a time | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

As a result of such “programmatic” buying, advertisers often are in the dark about where their ads end up. Advertisers can opt out of certain sites, of course, but only if they affirmatively place them on a blacklist of sites.

 

So when an ad appears on Breitbart, Sleeping Giants or one of its 109,000 Twitter followers and 35,000 Facebook followers flag the advertiser, often accompanied by an image of the sponsors’ ad next to a Breitbart story.

 

The other day, for example, a Sleeping Giants follower tweeted at Country Inns, informing the hotel chain that it was advertising on “the racist Breitbart site.” Within a day, the company tweeted back: “Thank you for your concern. . . . We have added Breitbart to our blacklist of ads.”

 

This apparently happens a lot. Sleeping Giants’ database lists nearly 2,900 companies that have declared Breitbart off limits since November — an astonishing figure, though one hard to confirm because some ad buys recur. Nevertheless, it’s not an implausible number. During one 24-hour period, advertisers such as the air-conditioning manufacturer Rheem, transport operator Caltrain, Sutter Health Plus and Rose Medical Center of Denver all publicly acknowledged that they had blacklisted Breitbart in response to a Sleeping Giants tweet....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Sleeping Giants is anonymous, but its approach to killing Breitbart’s advertising has been effective.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Clinton aims to trump Trump on Twitter

How Clinton aims to trump Trump on Twitter | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Hillary Clinton’s “delete your account” moment was no fluke: Her tweet heard round the world was just the most viral example of her newly aggressive effort to take the 2016 fight directly to Donald Trump on his favorite social media turf.

After a long primary campaign in which Trump has used Twitter to pump out an endless stream of taunts at rivals and gobble up news coverage, Clinton’s campaign has rolled out a strategy in recent weeks to turn the presumptive GOP nominee's own words against him — with some sly sarcasm and snark. Her barbs may appear off the cuff but are sometimes planned and edited well in advance, making the Clinton-Trump war on Twitter an extension of the contrast between their distinct political styles: staff-driven and tightly scripted versus shoot-from-the-hip, aggressive and biting.

Thursday’s skirmish represented the peak Twitter moment of the 2016 campaign so far. When Trump tweeted out an attack on President Barack Obama's endorsement of “Crooked Hillary,” her campaign responded five minutes later with “Delete your account” — a time-honored social media jibe that quickly became her most popular tweet ever, with more than 420,000 retweets and over half a million likes by Friday afternoon. (That far surpassed the traffic of Trump’s infamous “Taco Bowl” tweet from Cinco de Mayo.)

Trump waited more than two hours to tweet a response to Clinton: “How long did it take your staff of 823 people to think that up — and where are your 33,000 emails that you deleted?”...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

If you think it's not busy about politics on social media now just wait a couple of weeks.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Who Is Facebook's Biggest Republican Candidate? | The Whip

Who Is Facebook's Biggest Republican Candidate? | The Whip | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Social media will play a big part in next year’s US election. In addition to existing voters, many who will be coming of age and voting for the first time will have grown up with it, so it makes sense to target potential supporters on the platforms they use most frequently.

To see who’s making their voice heard on social at this early stage, we decided to take a look at the Facebook performance of Republican and Democratic nominees for the presidency. Because the first GOP debate took place last month, we looked at the the Republican field first....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

When it comes to social media, Carson and Trump lead the Republican pack.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Donald Trump Hijacked the Authenticity of the Web — Backchannel

How Donald Trump Hijacked the Authenticity of the Web — Backchannel | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

His credibility is zero, but by attacking political correctness he projects a true voice to his internet followers

In most ways, Donald Trump has taken poor advantage of the Net. He has not used it for organizing and spreading a movement the way the Occupy Wall Street or Arab Spring did. He has not used it to raise essential funding for his campaign, as Bernie Sanders does. He has not used it to build community among his supporters as presidential candidates since Howard Dean in 2004 have.

 

He has not even used it as the primary vehicle for getting his message out, relying instead on the countless hours of coverage broadcast media have provided for free — although he’s obviously no slouch at social media. But despite these missed opportunities, Donald Trump has utterly excelled in one single aspect of the Net. Leveraging — and perverting — one of its key values: Authentic speech.


Speech on the Net sounds very different than the voice of old media. When I was growing up, the media’s authoritative voice had the same accent. It was professionally enunciated, often presented as neutral and stripped of personal belief, always calm, and overwhelmingly male. Then the Internet liberated our voices, training us to expect people to speak for and as themselves, with all their idiosyncrasies and imperfections.


Trump’s voice is indeed authentic in that sense. After all, he is the first major candidate for the presidency of the United States who clearly writes his own tweets. Hillary Clinton (whom I support) tweets out carefully prepared campaign points that seem obviously to have been written by her staff — especially when the tweets are dispatched while Clinton is making a point in a live debate. Donald, on the other hand, just says whatever is crossing his mind at that moment, much of which is nasty, degrading, and untrue. The lack of a filter, the weird punctuation, the very clumsiness of its expression makes Trump’s Internet speech seem much more authentic than Clinton’s....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Interesting look at Donald Trump and social media.

leechdisplay's comment, June 16, 2016 11:25 PM
Thats cold
Juan Francisco García's curator insight, June 19, 2016 11:26 AM
Unbelievable
rachel caduri's curator insight, July 9, 2016 12:40 PM

This article makes a lot of valid points however, I think they are incorrect about one thing. While Donald Trump has said and done many unfavorable things, he has been able to do one thing correct, and that is create a following. While his ideas are not something I personally agree with, there are many that do and he has brought them all together. He has used the mass communication powers that Twitter allows to generate a community and voter-base. Like the article says, Trump has a certain authenticity and genuine nature about him and his tweets, that people are drawn to. Like one of module's discussed, CMC often allows people to hide behind carefully crafted tweets, messages, and profile pages in online dating. Though it is not for dating purposes, politicians and candidates do the same thing. They create an online and public persona based on what people want. Trump however, has broken all these rules and ideas, and a significant amount of people found that honesty refreshing. He did not hide behind political correctness as many have done.

Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

What Can The Presidential Candidates Teach Us About Social Marketing?

What Can The Presidential Candidates Teach Us About Social Marketing? | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

To run for president, you need to possess a certain je ne sais quoi when it comes to communicating messages that can provoke people to take action.

So regardless of which side of the aisle you sit on, your brand can take a lesson from each of the master marketers who remain in the race. The candidates clearly know how to engage their base.

Below are some of the top strategies and tactics of Decision 2016, which can be applied easily to your organization’s social channels to gain traction and win over some very loyal constituents....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Interesting marketing lessons from political candidates.

rodrick rajive lal's curator insight, March 25, 2016 8:55 AM

There is so much to learn from the US Presidential candidates especially  about effective social marketing strategies. Brand promoters  can learn a lot about  how to pitch their ideas, more effectively!

Mike Allen's curator insight, March 26, 2016 4:53 AM

Interesting marketing lessons from political candidates.