Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.6K views | +0 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

One on One: Hootsuite's Ryan Holmes on Why CEOs should Get Savvy with Social

One on One: Hootsuite's Ryan Holmes on Why CEOs should Get Savvy with Social | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Hootsuite founder and CEO, Ryan Holmes, dishes on why social media is not just important for brands, but for the heads of the brands as well.


When it comes to marketing, social media is often discussed as a channel directive. It is a channel marketers need to cultivate an audience on, and can be used to humanize their brand to an extent. Social—especially in the age of Trump—is now often a medium where brands must defend themselves against major scandals.


But we rarely bring CEOs into the marketing/social media mix.Ryan Holmes, founder and CEO of Hootsuite, spoke with us in the latest DMN One on One podcast. We caught up with Holmes a few days before the release of his latest book, "The 4 Billion Dollar Tweet." Here's our conversation on how CEOs can, and why they should, get savvy with social media....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Hootsuite founder and CEO, Ryan Holmes, dishes on why social media is not just important for brands, but for the heads of the brands as well. PS, it's not just because POTUS does it. Badly, LOL.

Barbara Jean Garza's comment, May 30, 2019 2:46 AM
As a new CEO with social media management experience, and entering a very antiquated world of chambers! I've found so much value in tapping into my knowledge of social media management and how it has impacted our work and reach.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Today's News Is All About Chevy's 'Technology And Stuff'

Today's News Is All About Chevy's  'Technology And Stuff' | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

No, we're not talking about Apple or Amazon or Big Data or the Marketing Cloud or Programmatic Buying.


Chevy’s Rikk Wilde “looked down at his notes often, spoke haltingly and explained to the pitcher that he'd like the Colorado” —Marketing Daily’s Karl Greenberg has the skinny today on its new “inner truck guy” conventional campaign — “because it has ‘class-winning and leading, you know, technology and stuff,’” James R. Healey reports in USA Today.


“The nervous Wilde was assured this morning he still has a job,” Greg Gardner and Alisa Priddle reported in the Detroit Free Press last evening. “And in fact he appears to have garnered millions in free publicity for the Chevrolet brand, which has received at least $2.4 million in media exposure from the unconventional presentation, according to Front Row Analytics. Bloomberg reports that is six times more than the $392,000 it would have brought in with a more polished performance.


”It did not take long for #technologyandstuff to pop up on Twitter with GM president North America Mark Reuss (@GMdudeinNA posting, “It's what I've been saying for years.....#technologyandstuff,” Gardner and Priddle report....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

In the world of viral and content marketing, this was a classic. Local Chevy manager makes big stage mistake. Empathy and sharing ensue. Mistake goes viral on the net. GM seizes opportunity. Picks up up the bat and hits a grand slam content marketing home run.


You gotta love the internet for stories like these. And for once you've got to admire the big faceless corporation, in this case GM, seeing a good thing in a little guy's mistake. Love the story. Somebody buy Rikk Wilde a Duff's beer or two. Recommended reading. 9/10

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Brands Mess Up in Social Media | Digiday

Brands Mess Up in Social Media | Digiday | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

Domino's and Bank of America show that having humans handling social media doesn't mean they'll act human.


Last week, Domino’s stepped in it on Facebook. A customer took to the brand’s Facebook page to compliment the chain, which then responded with a rote “Sorry for your bad experience” response. Digiday, along with others, covered the snafu, which appeared to point out the perils of relying on automated responses in social media.


And yet the error was actually a mistake made by a human, according to Domino’s. In much the same way as Bank of America screwed up last month by having a social media team sounding a lot like robots, a Domino’s employee mistook the compliment for a complaint. The employee then, it would appear, gave the default response for social media complaints. Domino’s, to its credit, tried to regain its footing by taking it in stride. The rub with brands in social media is that they’ll need humans, who are prone to make mistakes....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Several recent good case studies on social media missteps, why automation work and how humans still need to engage properly.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Branding in the Age of Social Media

Branding in the Age of Social Media | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

In the era of Facebook and YouTube, brand building has become a vexing challenge. This is not how things were supposed to turn out. A decade ago most companies were heralding the arrival of a new golden age of branding. They hired creative agencies and armies of technologists to insert brands throughout the digital universe. Viral, buzz, memes, stickiness, and form factor became the lingua franca of branding. But despite all the hoopla, such efforts have had very little payoff.

As a central feature of their digital strategy, companies made huge bets on what is often called branded content. The thinking went like this: Social media would allow your company to leapfrog traditional media and forge relationships directly with customers. If you told them great stories and connected with them in real time, your brand would become a hub for a community of consumers. Businesses have invested billions pursuing this vision. Yet few brands have generated meaningful consumer interest online. In fact, social media seems to have made brands less significant. What has gone wrong?

To solve this puzzle, we need to remember that brands succeed when they break through in culture. And branding is a set of techniques designed to generate cultural relevance. Digital technologies have not only created potent new social networks but also dramatically altered how culture works. Digital crowds now serve as very effective and prolific innovators of culture—a phenomenon I call crowdculture. Crowdculture changes the rules of branding—which techniques work and which do not. If we understand crowdculture, then, we can figure out why branded-content strategies have fallen flat—and what alternative branding methods are empowered by social media....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Doug Holt looks at the impact of social media on branding and how marketers need to embrace new brand strategies for social media success. A valuable must-read for marketers. 9/10

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

How Klout Is Twerking Your Mind About Influence

How Klout Is Twerking Your Mind About Influence | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

...By calling social scores “Influence Scores,” companies like Klout (who’s tagline is “The Standard For Influence”) have set expectations in the market that influence can be measured with scoring algorithms. However, influence is much more complex.


By setting the wrong expectations, social scoring companies have changed how marketing and PR professionals think about influence, and how to identify it. Instead of finding influencers from a context and audience approach, marketing and PR professionals look at metrics like follower count, unique visitors, and social scores to get a glimpse on who’s “influential,” which in most cases doesn’t work – popularity doesn’t necessarily equal influence....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

Social cred or socially awkward? A thoughtful post that raises some interesting questions about social influence, twerking or not.

Ali Anani's curator insight, September 6, 2013 12:21 AM

Scores that are not

Chris Decroix's curator insight, September 9, 2013 3:26 AM

Measuring social influence isn't all about popularity on social networks...

Stephen Dale's curator insight, September 9, 2013 4:11 AM

This quote from the article says it all for me:

 

It’s not the size of the influencer’s audience that matters, or even how/if the influencer talks about your brand. What matters is how others react to what the influencer says about your brand.

 

Another example of how we get misled by not understanding the meaning of numbers - e.g. a high Klout/Peerindex/Kred score.