Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
443.4K views | +2 today
Follow
Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight
Social marketing, PR insight & thought leadership - from The PR Coach
Curated by Jeff Domansky
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Publishers Overseas Are Making Money By Targeting Americans With Cheap — And Sometimes False — Information About Niche Topics

Publishers Overseas Are Making Money By Targeting Americans With Cheap — And Sometimes False — Information About Niche Topics | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it
As ad dollars that used to fund journalism pour into the coffers of Facebook and Google, the information business is experiencing a trend familiar to other American industries: The product they produce is now competing with cheaper versions coming from overseas.

Content farmers in the Philippines, Pakistan, Macedonia (of course), and beyond are launching websites and Facebook pages aimed at Americans in niches such as politics, mental health, marijuana, American muscle cars, and more.

Based on Facebook engagement and other metrics, some of these overseas publishers are now beating their American counterparts. In the process they’re building an industry centered on producing and exporting cheap (and sometimes false) information targeted at the US.

“This is like all of the basic stuff happening in economics and politics today,” said Tyson Barker, a political economist with the Aspen Institute Germany who specializes in international economic policy. “It's a globalization trend and you've seen it also in manufacturing and other industries.”
Jeff Domansky's insight:

Here's a thoughtful post by Craig Silverman on the impact of globalization on journalism and publishing. Recommended reading! 10/10

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Facebook vs. Twitter vs. Snapchat: Who Will Win the News Wars?

Facebook vs. Twitter vs. Snapchat: Who Will Win the News Wars? | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

It’s no secret the traditional news industry is on the ropes. Recently, the BBC slashed another 1,000 jobs. Viewership on US news networks like Fox, CNN and MSNBC has dropped 19 percent since 2009. Newspapers have cut more than a third of their workforce in the last 25 years.

But here’s the thing: these dismal stats don’t reflect actual demand. Viewers and readers aren’t abandoning the news; instead, they’re switching over to social media and other online sources in droves. The number of people who consume news via major social networks has significantly spiked in just two years, with the majority of Twitter users (63 percent) and Facebook users (63 percent) now saying they get their news from the platforms.

Not surprisingly, social media giants have been racing to take advantage of this increasing demand—bringing in more and more news elements to their platforms and making it easier than ever for users to get convenient, timely information via their social feeds. In the years to come, social media will only have a bigger impact on how news is distributed, consumed (and ultimately monetized). To get an idea of what the future might look like, here’s peek inside the playbooks of some of the biggest players:...

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The epic battle for audience and subscribers switches from traditional media to social media.

No comment yet.
Scooped by Jeff Domansky
Scoop.it!

Here's Why That Misleading AP Tweet About Hillary Clinton Matters

Here's Why That Misleading AP Tweet About Hillary Clinton Matters | Public Relations & Social Marketing Insight | Scoop.it

It looked like a garden-variety promotional tweet, designed to attract attention to the AP’s big investigation into allegations of conflict of interest on the part of the Democratic presidential candidate. But by trying too hard to drum up interest in the piece, the wire service made itself the target instead.

The post made a significant, and startling, claim. Namely, that “more than half those who met Clinton as Cabinet secretary gave money to Clinton Foundation.” Surely this was compelling evidence of a conflict.

As sharp-eyed reporters for competing news outlets noted within minutes of the tweet and article being posted, however, this statistic was only true if you ignored the thousands of government officials, dignitaries, and so on that Clinton met in her capacity as Secretary of State....

Jeff Domansky's insight:

The perils of social media, politics and AP's surprising lapse in fact checking and journalism ethics.

No comment yet.