"Human-dependent peer review is inequitable, suffers from injustice, and is potentially unsustainable. Here's why we should replace it (eventually) with AI-based peer review ..."
Via Leona Ungerer, יפה בן-דרור
Research and publish the best content.
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Already have an account: Login
Education 2.0 & 3.0
148.6K views |
+4 today
 Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
|
Scoop.it!
The shift towards open access is an opportunity to reform academic publishing to better serve the public interest. Via Ivon Prefontaine, PhD 
Monica S Mcfeeters's curator insight,
July 14, 2017 2:55 PM
Academic publishing is at a crossroads. There is a reference several times in the article to "public good," but no description as to what it means. There are ethical and practical issues involved in shifts in publishing. Without ethical guides what we are seeing in politics runs the risk of encroaching into academics, if has not already.
|
